Capitation in healthcare is a payment arrangement that pays a physician or group of physicians a set amount for each enrolled patient assigned to them, per period of time, whether or not that patient seeks care.
Who pays the capitation?
This fixed payment is usually calculated per month and is paid by an insurer or health maintenance organization (HMO) to a healthcare provider. The amount can be based on various factors, including the average expected healthcare utilization of the patient group, with adjustments for patient demographics, geographic area, and the specific services covered under the capitation agreement.
Capitation vs. fee-for-service arrangements
This payment model contrasts with fee-for-service (FFS) arrangements, where providers are paid for each individual service they deliver, such as tests, procedures, and visits. Capitation aims to encourage efficient and effective care by placing the financial risk on the provider’s side. Since the payment is fixed, providers are motivated to focus on preventive care and the management of chronic conditions to avoid costly interventions and hospitalizations that are not reimbursed beyond the capitated rate.
Types of capitation models
There are different types of capitation models, including:
- Full Capitation: This covers all of a patient’s healthcare services, including primary care, specialist services, hospitalization, and sometimes prescription drugs.
- Partial Capitation: This covers only a specified range of services, such as primary care, and may exclude others like specialty care or hospital stays.
Impact on the insured
Whether it matters for the insured that the healthcare professional is paid with a capitation arrangement depends on several factors, including the patient’s personal healthcare needs, preferences for accessing healthcare services, and priorities in their healthcare experience. Here’s how the payment model can affect patients:
Under Capitation:
- Pros: This model can incentivize providers to focus on preventive care and maintaining the overall health of patients, as providers receive the same payment regardless of how many times the patient visits. It may lead to more holistic and long-term health management strategies, potentially resulting in better health outcomes for patients.
- Cons: There’s a possible disincentive for providers to offer extensive or costly services, as the capitation payment remains fixed regardless of the volume of care provided. Patients might worry about the potential for underutilization of services or feel rushed during appointments.
As the type of payment arrangement can have an impact on the insured, people in the market for health insurance plans can try to find out the type of payment arrangement that insurance companies have with their healthcare professionals.
The goal of capitation is to control healthcare costs while maintaining or improving the quality of care. By providing a set amount of money for each patient, healthcare providers are incentivized to offer care that is necessary and avoid unnecessary services. However, critics argue that it may also create an incentive to underserve patients or to select healthier patients over those with significant healthcare needs. To mitigate such risks, capitation agreements often include quality or performance measures that providers must meet to ensure that patient care does not suffer under this payment model.
Was this helpful?
0 / 0